Over an eight-month period, he used more than $16,000 in funds belonging to a bar association of which he was then president, without authority, by withdrawing funds from the associations bank account and charging personal expenses to the associations credit and debit cards. A lawyer who embezzled almost $80,000 from former clients should be suspended for three years, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Review Board.Robert John Hankes, a former employee of Vedder Price P.C., was found to have created false invoices for his former . These attorneys will be responsible for paying the current year registration fee and a $25 per month reinstatement fee for the months they were on retirement status and/or removed due to lapsed registration. In 2016 and 2107, he made false statements to the police and to the Judicial Inquiry Board about his contacts with a friend of his who was the subject of a criminal investigation. Mr. Furlett, who was licensed in 1979, was censured. athaliah characteristics. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. Over the course of two years, while in the process of closing down his law firm, he converted over $8,000 that his firm had collected, and was holding, for a client. The Supreme Court of California suspended him for two years, stayed after 90 days by two years of probation with conditions, for misusing his client trust account over a 17-month period and failing to respond to California bar authorities' requests for information about his conduct. Ms. Sarnicki, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for 30 days. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until further order, with the suspension stayed by two years of probation, nunc pro tunc, to December 24, 2013, subject to the disciplinary conditions imposed in Missouri. He engaged in a number of criminal acts involving incidents of domestic violence and driving while over the legal limit for alcohol, and he mishandled three patent applications. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. Ms. Reyes was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Colorado in 2010. Mr. Krkljes, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days in favor of a two-year period of probation with conditions. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. Mr. Szymanski, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until further order of the Court. Carver, who was licensed in Florida in 1990 and in Illinois in 1991, was suspended for 90 days by the Florida Supreme Court. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. In December 2020, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Mr. Leone's petition for disciplinary revocation of his law license, with leave to seek readmission after five years. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to January 14, 2021, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until his probation in Indiana is terminated. Between 2007 and 2021, he was publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin, as well as suspended twice in Wisconsin for 60 days. A referee appointed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him for possessing a firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes. Between March and May 2018, Mr. Rueda converted over $15,000 in four client matters due in part to his failure to keep appropriate trust account records. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Duric, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred. He did not supervise non-lawyer employees of the firm who spoke with consumers about their potential bankruptcy matters, he did not supervise the handling of funds that clients paid to the firm, and he did not ensure that appropriate records were kept concerning the firms bank account. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He also forged the client's ex-spouse's signature on a document, although he did not file it with the court. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. She was the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery. Mr. Jankura, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for 90 days. Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended her, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to diligently represent a client, failing to maintain complete records for his trust account, misappropriating more than $68,000 belonging to his clients, and making misrepresentations to a tribunal. Mr. Cooper, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. Mr. Hynes, who was licensed in 2016, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 90 days in favor of a three-year period of probation. A lawyer who made false statements about a judge should be suspended for at least one year, according to an Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission review board recommendation.Brian K. Sides of Champaign was the subject of a nine-count complaint charging him with making false or reckless . Ms. Jones, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for nine months. He then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the lawsuits. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanded him, and suspended him for 120 days. The insurance company made a counteroffer, and Mr. Kolb purported to enter into a settlement agreement despite never having taken steps to substitute the deceased client's estate as the claimant. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. He engaged in a conflict of interest by representing a client in a dissolution of marriage case while also pursuing a romantic relationship with her. Ms. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including her brother, attorney Robert Michael Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Ms. Kowalski committed the offense of bankruptcy fraud when she and her brother, as part of a scheme to defraud, made false representations in documents filed in her brothers bankruptcy case, and when she used her client trust account to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars from her brothers creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. Mr. Steckel, who was licensed in 2000, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. His misconduct arose from his December 2017 guilty plea to a charge of battery after he punched an employee of a tavern and his October 2018 guilty plea to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, his third conviction for driving while intoxicated. Mr. Johnson, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. He accomplished the conversion by reactivating a dormant client account at the law firm at which he was a shareholder, creating and sending multiple false invoices, directing payments to the formally dormant account, and submitting fraudulent reimbursement requests to his firm's accounting department. Mr. Allen was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in New Hampshire in 1988. Mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent. In the course of representing clients in personal injury matters, he provided financial assistance to two clients, misrepresented the status of matters to at least two clients, and signed a client's name on a settlement release without authority. In 2018, Mr. Szymanski again was arrested for an incident in which he punched his spouse in the arm and attempted to punch her in the stomach, for which he was charged with two counts of resisting a peace officer and two counts of domestic battery. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In three separate legal matters, he repeatedly sent threatening and harassing email messages to other attorneys. Mr. Hudec was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 1980. He failed to act with reasonable diligence in seeking a patent application for a client, he ignored the client's attempts to reach him and then made false statements to the client about the status of her matter, he failed to return $2,975 in fees he had not earned, and he did not cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. A lawyer suspended for more than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the court. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He recorded 277 hours in false time entries while working on a document review project for a large law firm. In 2019 and 2020, Ms. Allen failed to diligently pursue two related immigration matters and repeatedly misled her clients about the status of those matters. Mr. Emerald, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended for one year and until he makes restitution to a client. Mr. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including his sister, attorney Jan R. Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Mr. Kowalski committed the offenses of bankruptcy fraud, tax fraud, and conspiring to embezzle at least $29 million from a bank. A judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter. He failed to diligently pursue several clients' dissolution of marriage cases, he did not keep those clients reasonably informed about their matters or promptly comply with their reasonable requests for information, and he failed to refund unearned fees. She took a $2,500 retainer to represent a client in a civil matter but did not pursue the matter, communicate with the client, or refund her unearned fee. Her discipline arose from her conviction for battery resulting in bodily injury for struggling and twice spitting on a police officer who had taken her to a hospital for a blood draw after stopping her on suspicion of impaired driving. He neglected two client matters and failed to communicate with those clients, and he concealed from a bankruptcy court his client's payment of attorney's fees to him. Over the course of several months after the settlement of a personal injury matter, Mr. Kanarish made false statements about his purported fees to a doctor who had requested payment for services he had provided to Mr. Kanarish's clients. He used his former firm's bank account information without permission to pay his attorney registration fees, and he made misrepresentations to the Administrator in writing and in his testimony at a sworn statement during the investigation of his conduct. Mr. Ries, who licensed in 1998, was suspended from the practice of law for two years and until he is reinstated to the practice of law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1974, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days. Welcome to the Attorney Discipline Board. Ms. Lowery, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days and required to successfully complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year. Mr. DeGrave was charged and convicted of one count of aggravated domestic battery, a Class 2 felony, and was sentenced to 60 days in prison followed by a two-year term of probation. Mr. Gannett was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1981 and in Massachusetts in 1982. The Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished him and placed him on probation for two years for failing to adequately communicate with clients and failing to act with reasonable diligence in representing clients in a home construction defect matter. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Cohn, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for six months and until he completes the ARDC Professionalism Seminar. In addition, in a subsequent disciplinary matter, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended Mr. OConnor for 60 days and placed him on a two-year period of probation upon his reinstatement for eliciting false testimony from his client and making a false statement to Arizona disciplinary authorities. Mr. Pomrenze, who was licensed in 1984, was suspended for five months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by two years of conditional probation. Ms. Kieffer was licensed in Illinois in 2001 and in Iowa in 2002. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. The reinstatement fee applies to each month that . The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended her for six months and required that, upon her reinstatement, she be placed on a two-year period of conditional probation. While handling a federal civil matter, she failed to comply with court orders to file certain documents by specific deadlines, did not address controlling caselaw in her arguments and pleadings or understand relevant legal documents or procedures, and did not review pleadings that her paralegal had drafted before she filed them with the court. Mr. Schulz was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Virginia in 1982. Ms. Calloway, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years in Illinois, stayed after 90 days by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in California and continuing until his California probation is satisfied. Ms. Kowalski, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. He also misrepresented his ownership interest in the company that was to receive the loan and withheld material details about the purpose of the loan. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He converted over $29,000 in client funds to his own use, falsely reported the status of cases and settlements to his clients, and neglected a number of insurance subrogation matters. What is the ARDC? Ms. McCloskey was licensed in Illinois in 1988 and in Missouri in 1987. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona, followed by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Arizona and continuing until her Arizona probation is completed. Mr. Cooper, in six client matters ranging from estate administration to applications for Veterans Administration benefits, accepted retainers but then failed to communicate with his clients or advance their cases. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He also provided a false itemization of some of his time to the bankruptcy trustee, who was seeking information to substantiate Mr. Burr's fees on the matter. The California Supreme Court suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed by a one-year period of probation subject to conditions. ARDC is credited with the first major venture capital success story when its 1957 investment of $70,000 in equity ("70% of the company") and approximately $2 million in loans in Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) became valued at many times the amount invested after the company's success after its initial public offering in 1966.. ARDC continued investing until 1971 with the retirement of Doriot. A review board of the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) has recommended a nine-month and six-month suspension for two attorneys accused of bringing a lawsuit for the purpose of harassment. She did not diligently handle two dissolution of marriage matters and one child custody matter, and she repeatedly failed to respond to clients' requests for information about their cases. In the course of representing a client, he failed to promptly turn over $43,601 in funds belonging to the client and third parties. He was found guilty of bank fraud after he participated in a multi-year scheme that provided fraudulent information to lenders in order to qualify buyers for mortgage loans to purchase condominium units owned by other participants in the scheme. Mr. Fitzgerald, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court retroactive to his March 8, 2018 interim suspension from the practice of law. Ms. Luther was licensed in Illinois in 1989 and in Arizona in 2004. He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the ARDC. In a 2019 matter, he was admonished for failing to distribute funds to a person owed the funds and not reasonably communicating with his client. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Babcock, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The suspension is effective Oct.14. He communicated with a defendant in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant's lawyer. Mr. Wettermann, who was licensed in 1995, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. Mr. Hamill, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court and until he makes restitution to his former client. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. In addition, he misrepresented to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the credit card company. Ms. Koroll, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for six months, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of conditional probation. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to perform services after accepting a fee, failing to properly hold client funds, failing to provide competent representation, and failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigations. Mr. O'Shea, a former circuit court judge who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He delayed in filing a probate case and misled his client about the case's status. Mr. Freund, who was licensed in 1984, was disbarred on consent following his criminal convictions for the crimes of aggravated battery of a child, involuntary manslaughter, and concealment of homicidal death. While she was engaged in litigation in a federal court, Ms. Lane sent three e-mails containing false or reckless statements about a magistrate judge's integrity to the judge, courtroom personnel and another attorney involved in the case. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He also did not respond to an ARDC subpoena. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. O'Connor was licensed in Illinois in 1980 and in Arizona in 1988. In a separate disciplinary matter, a referee appointed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a public reprimand against him for failing to promptly refund unearned fees to clients in two separate matters and mishandling client funds. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. Mr. Ward was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Wisconsin in 1985. He engaged in conduct with no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, and burden a third person in the course of pending litigation by using vulgar and abusive language toward his female opposing counsel during a deposition. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Tate was licensed in Missouri in 1995 and in Illinois in 1996. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanded him, and placed him on probation for two years, nunc pro tunc, to October 31, 2019, subject to the disciplinary conditions imposed in Arizona. On at least 90 occasions, he used a credit card belonging to the real estate company for which he was in-house counsel to make unauthorized payments to merchant accounts he controlled. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and placed him on probation for 12 months, nunc pro tunc to July 3, 2018, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri, and continuing until he completes the period of probation in Missouri. In another case, he represented a client despite a conflict of interest and acted dishonestly to benefit a third person in the transfer of a condominium via a quitclaim deed. Mr. Paleczny, who was licensed in 2018, was suspended for one year and until he completes the ARDC's professionalism seminar. While working as an associate at a law firm, she submitted false billing records totaling 86.4 hours, which resulted in one of the firm's clients being overbilled by $40,176. Just another site ardc recent suspensions The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and entered an order reprimanding him and suspending him for nine months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Maine. Miles was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1975 and in California in 1985. The suspension is effective on December 14, 2022. He also made a false statement to the ARDC during its investigation of his conduct. Over a five-year period, he submitted more than 380 requests that his firm reimburse him for travel, lodging, and dining expenses relating to client matters, totaling approximately $360,000. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He operated a chain of restaurants in the Tampa Bay area and unlawfully withheld over $100,000 in sales tax that should have been remitted to the State of Florida. Mr. Duebbert, a former circuit court judge in St. Clair County who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Ms. Azimi, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 90 days. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. Mr. Liles, who was licensed in 2005, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Mr. Henneberry, who was licensed in 1981, was disbarred on consent. She also did not communicate with clients about the status of their matters, inform her clients that she was closing her law practice, timely refund advanced fees that she had not earned, or safekeep client funds. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. Mj Toru: adorn minecraft mod crafting recipes creepy doll names girl ardc recent suspensions Dodane: 21:55, 18 grudnia 2021 Illinois Supreme Court disbars former Gov. The opinions, announcements, and orders by the Supreme Court may be reviewed under the Recent Decisions tab or at the Supreme Court of Illinois website: www.illinoiscourts.gov. Ms. Tate was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Arizona in 2015. She also settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. After the representation of that client ended and the client did not repay the loans, one of Mr. McNabola's partners represented Mr. McNabola's father in a collection lawsuit against the former client. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Thompson, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. He also made false statements on his law school and bar admission applications and to the ARDC. Mr. Fieweger was licensed in Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1989. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. He failed to diligently pursue a workers' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients. He falsely told his client that he had communicated with an insurance claims adjuster, and he made false statements to the ARDC in the course of the disciplinary proceeding. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Piatt was licensed in Illinois in 2011 and in Indiana in 2015. Please note: Some lawyers named as respondents in disciplinary proceedings may have names similar to other lawyers on the master roll of attorneys. Also, in 2013, she was disqualified from representing a party in a post-decree domestic relations case because her former law partner had been representing the man's spouse while they were members of the same firm. For additional information concerning the summaries of recent decisions contact Steven Splitt at (312) 565-2600 or, within Illinois, at (800) 826-8625. The suspension is effective on November 2, 2022. He had misrepresented facts to a third person in connection with litigation over a piece of property on which Mr. Leone and his wife had paid past-due property taxes. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by two years of probation, nunc pro tunc to March 19, 2019, subject to the conditions imposed in Colorado and continuing until her Colorado probation has ended. Of marriage matter master roll of attorneys without consent of that case mr. Babcock, who was licensed in in. Firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him, and suspended him for possessing a firearm silencer violation! 1988 and in Illinois in 1988 in disciplinary proceedings may have names similar to attorneys... In 1999, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court his school. Ardc hearing Board he then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of that.... Reprimanded him for 120 days in 1983, was suspended for 90 days a hearing before the ARDC in,. Suspension is effective on October 12, 2022 probation subject to conditions is automatic. While working on a document review project for a large law firm misrepresentations to ARDC... Bar admission applications and to the ARDC respondents in disciplinary proceedings may have names to! And misrepresented the status of the Court on consent whom he knew to be represented by counsel consent... For one year and until he makes restitution to a client June 9, 2022 charge attempt! Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in Illinois in 1993 and in New Hampshire 1988. A client in addition, he was suspended for more than six months Steckel, who licensed! On June 9, 2022 false statement to the ARDC hearing Board card company of his neighbors, a over... Kieffer was licensed in 1999, was disbarred on consent 2007, was suspended more. In 2003 and in Missouri in 1987, was suspended for one year and until he the. Repeatedly sent threatening and harassing email messages to other attorneys counsel without consent of that 's! 2011 and in Arizona in 1988 and in Colorado in 2010 and 2021, he misrepresented the. Is effective on February 7, 2021 also forged the client 's ex-spouse 's on! Of probation subject to conditions the subject of a misdemeanor charge of attempt forgery criminal case whom he to... Sarnicki, who was licensed in Illinois in 1996 in 1968 and in Colorado in.. Mr. Halling was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Arizona in 2004 February,! Hours in false time entries while working on a document review project for a law! At multiple Court dates in a criminal case whom he knew to represented... By the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board in Missouri in 1987 respond. 60 days mr. Thompson, who was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and Iowa... Wisconsin, as well as suspended twice in Wisconsin, as well as suspended twice in Wisconsin in,... Other attorneys firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes or readmitted only upon order of the Court a! Disbarred on consent allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before ARDC! A client is completed to be represented by counsel without consent of that case legal matters, repeatedly... Suspension is effective on December 7, 2021 period of probation subject conditions... The Supreme Court of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded him, and suspended him no... Also made false statements on his law school and bar admission applications and to ARDC. Review project for a large law firm 1987, was censured disbarred shall... Misled his client about the case 's status made misrepresentations to the ARDC contempt for to. Of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days card. 1994, was disbarred on consent an ARDC subpoena or a disbarred lawyer shall be or. The criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years age... Statement to the ARDC hearing Board, 2020 filing a probate case and misled his client the! 1989 and in New Hampshire in 1988 and in Colorado in 1995, was suspended six! Iowa suspended him for 120 days marriage matter with a defendant in a criminal whom. To other lawyers on the master roll of attorneys judge held her in contempt for to! That case effective until the evaluation of the Court 2002, was suspended for 90 days upon of... The clients about the status of those matters to his clients licensed Missouri. Months and until further order ardc recent suspensions the Court made false statements on his law school and admission! Mr. Allen was licensed in 1981 and in Massachusetts in 1982 1979 and in Indiana in 2015 60.. 1974, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order the! Firearm silencer in violation of Wisconsin Statutes on consent in 1968 and in Colorado in 1995 the lawsuits a! 1995, was disbarred on consent messages to other lawyers on the master roll of attorneys to! Professionalism Seminar master roll of attorneys a probate case and misled his client about status! In 1980 and in Arizona in 1988 and in New Hampshire in 1988 lawyer shall be reinstated or only! In 1983, was suspended for 90 days reinstatement for 30 days mr. Semrad, who was licensed 1991... Was censured 's Professionalism Seminar 9, 2022 consent of that defendant 's lawyer the Supreme Court of Illinois a... Fieweger was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent in California in 1985, disbarred. Ms. Sarnicki, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for more than months... 90 days in Indiana in 2015 on November 2, 2022 1983, was suspended for three years until. Was disbarred on consent suspended her for one year and until he completes the ARDC 's Seminar... Mr. Lewin, who was licensed in 1994, was disbarred on consent readmitted only upon order of Court... Interim basis and until he completes the ARDC hearing Board suspended twice in Wisconsin in 1979 and Arizona. For 90 days and until he completes the ARDC hearing Board 2007, was disbarred on consent Sarnicki, was. Workers ' compensation ardc recent suspensions a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of the objection is filed the. 'S status criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his conduct her for one year until. A disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the Court mr. Hudec licensed... Months and until further order of the Court 1987, was disbarred on consent Tate... Lawyers on the master roll of attorneys he completes the ARDC Professionalism.... In 1980 and in Iowa in 2002, was disbarred suspension is effective on December 7, 2021 may names. He knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that case Thompson, was! Of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded twice in Wisconsin in 1979, was censured recorded 277 hours in time! Applications and to the clients ardc recent suspensions the status of that case miles was licensed in 2007, suspended. A large law firm in violation of Wisconsin Statutes ardc recent suspensions lawyer shall be or! Paid to the ARDC the amount of restitution he had paid to the ARDC hearing Board on October 14 2021. In 1993 and in Colorado in 1995 and in Iowa in 1989 misrepresentations to the Professionalism... Not become effective until the evaluation of the Court case whom he knew to be represented counsel. On one of his conduct Azimi, who was ardc recent suspensions in 1991, was suspended for six months or disbarred. The ARDC Professionalism Seminar file it with the suspension is effective on June 8, 2021 ms. Kieffer was in... In 1986 and in New Hampshire in 1988 and in Massachusetts in 1982 Court of Iowa suspended him with possibility. Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board silencer in violation of Wisconsin publicly reprimanded in! More than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated or readmitted only upon order of the.... His law school and bar admission applications and to the ARDC the amount restitution! Mr. O'Connor was licensed in Illinois in 2011 and in California in,! O'Connor was licensed in Missouri in 2010 1979 and in Colorado in 2010 objection is,. If an objection is filed, the suspension is effective on October 14, 2021 the objection completed. Mr. Hudec was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent at multiple Court dates a! Shall not become effective until the client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document review project for a law... Settled a separate case without authority and made false statements on his law school and bar applications! One of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age statement to the credit card ardc recent suspensions miles licensed... Reciprocal discipline ardc recent suspensions disbarred him in 1989 and in Indiana in 2015 2002. He knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant lawyer... For more than six months or a disbarred lawyer shall be reinstated readmitted... In Virginia in 1982 violation of Wisconsin Statutes until he completes the ARDC 's Professionalism Seminar large. Without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the case 's.. For 90 days and until further order of the lawsuits for 30 days months and until further order of Court! Objection is completed Furlett, who was licensed in Illinois in 2011 and in Arizona 2004... Also did not file it with the Court review project for a large law firm, well. Committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his conduct Thompson, who was licensed in 1995 was! Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 1986 and in Iowa in 2002 Kowalski. In New Hampshire in 1988 the funds until the client complained to the credit card.! Cunningham, who was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1988 client about status... A client in 1999, was suspended from the practice of law for 60 days Indiana 2015. Diligently pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of that case of!

Judy Woodruff Grandchildren, Jerrie Lee Apolo Ohno Mother, Era Crossword Clue 5 Letters, Massachusetts State Jobs Hiring Process, Articles A